|
Post by Fryguy64 on Dec 14, 2006 10:42:53 GMT -5
To be fair, ever since I was a young child the two WWF organisations confused me. It's not a small animal rights group either - at least over here it's possibly the biggest animal rights group, and they tend to have their logo smattered all over stuff.
Although how, as a child, I could confuse the chunky metallic World Wrestling Federation logo with the gentle panda-adorned World Wildlife Fund logo now baffles me. Although apparently I'm not alone, or else the fund wouldn't have bothered taking on the federation in the first place.
Their diametrically opposed stances on caring probably didn't help either.
|
|
|
Post by mrmolecule on Dec 14, 2006 15:18:46 GMT -5
How about "Wildlife Wrestling Foundation"?
|
|
|
Post by Fryguy64 on Dec 18, 2006 3:59:29 GMT -5
I don't care what you say... as beefy as those wrestlers are, chuck a good polar bear in with 'em and they're screwed.
And the ref.... and perhaps some of the audience.
|
|