|
|
Post by commanderflint on Jul 19, 2007 13:24:53 GMT -5
Anyone else gonna get them? As a fanboy of the Nintendo Wars Franchise I say yes.(Yes AW4 is confirmed! ;D)
|
|
|
|
Post by nocturnal YL on Jul 19, 2007 15:49:44 GMT -5
What? Another Famicom Wars DS!?
And.. you know, Battalion Wars is rather unconnected to other Famicom Wars games, besides the name.
|
|
|
|
Post by commanderflint on Jul 19, 2007 22:12:55 GMT -5
What? Another Famicom Wars DS!? And.. you know, Battalion Wars is rather unconnected to other Famicom Wars games, besides the name. Actually theJapanese name of Battalion Wars is Famicom Wars, they're both by 1st/2nd party and it used to be AW:Under Fire. |
|
|
|
Post by Hiker of Games on Jul 19, 2007 22:26:38 GMT -5
Yeah. It's basically just a spinoff series with no continuity to Advance Wars.
|
|
thores
Bubbles
Kirby and Pikachu: BFF
Posts: 581
|
Post by thores on Jul 20, 2007 0:39:27 GMT -5
I actually traded in Sonic and the Secret Rings for Batallion Wars a couple of days ago. I've been busy with Paper Mario so I haven't actually PLAYED it yet, but when I do play it, I'll be getting BWii if I like it.
And I've played Advance Wars 1 which was great, and I own Dual Strike which is also great. Of course they're both also immensely hard, so I probably won't get AWDS2, because I'm not THAT masochistic.
|
|
|
|
Post by nocturnal YL on Jul 20, 2007 7:10:14 GMT -5
"Tsugeki" Famicom Wars and just Famicom Wars is actually really different.
For one thing, it is not on the same contingent.
And Advance Wars games can never be hard. By saying that's hard, i guess you've never tried Fire Emblem series (Don't tell me about exceptions like FE2, FE4 nd FE8), eh?
|
|
|
|
Post by commanderflint on Jul 20, 2007 8:02:37 GMT -5
"Tsugeki" Famicom Wars and just Famicom Wars is actually really different. For one thing, it is not on the same contingent. And Advance Wars games can never be hard. By saying that's hard, i guess you've never tried Fire Emblem series (Don't tell me about exceptions like FE2, FE4 nd FE8), eh? AW is just abit harder then FE...FE5 is fun... |
|
|
|
Post by nocturnal YL on Jul 21, 2007 7:28:14 GMT -5
Whoa, you call FE5 "fun"?
Well, I love straight killing in later chapters,but initially before we have any 20-for-all-stat mages (I love Asvel gameplay-wise) it's just very hard...
At least I can get pass the first few chapters easily for AW2. And seems like we'll have a lot to talk about, huh? Nice to see someone like you, I'd say.
And I'm starting to think if I should have AWDS2.... Of course, I guess I gotta finish my IntSys collecting thing on Wii and GC first.
|
|
|
|
Post by commanderflint on Jul 21, 2007 9:14:21 GMT -5
Whoa, you call FE5 "fun"? Well, I love straight killing in later chapters,but initially before we have any 20-for-all-stat mages (I love Asvel gameplay-wise) it's just very hard... At least I can get pass the first few chapters easily for AW2. And seems like we'll have a lot to talk about, huh? Nice to see someone like you, I'd say. And I'm starting to think if I should have AWDS2.... Of course, I guess I gotta finish my IntSys collecting thing on Wii and GC first. Yeah.  Anyways people say AW is abit harder then FE... |
|
|
|
Post by Hiker of Games on Jul 21, 2007 13:26:47 GMT -5
Not anyone that I've ever met.  At the very least though, AW's strategy is mission by mission. Fire Emblem requires you to strategically level your units through the progression of the game. Failure to do that means you make the games potentially more difficult for you. |
|
Anyways people say AW is abit harder then FE...