What we know! (SPOILERS INCLUDED)

[Smashchu]

tveye said:

The user vigorously performs a mystic, powerful dance that boosts its Attack and Speed stats.

This is also Smash Bros, where that would work as an attack.

[thores]

tveye said:

The user vigorously performs a mystic, powerful dance that boosts its Attack and Speed stats.

[Smashchu]

thores said:

tveye said:

That was pretty bad. I can only vaguely see an innuendo in there.

[Fryguy64]

I think the word "vigorously" pretty much applies itself automatically to dirty thoughts. Just like the word "girth".

[Smashchu]

admin said:

I think the word "vigorously" pretty much applies itself automatically to dirty thoughts. Just like the word "girth".

That's what I was thinking off. But we really need to use Todd less. It's not as special if you just spam it when someone says something close to what could be considered an innuendo. I say use him when there is a good opportunity, or it's clever.

[8bitretroshit]

When somebody uses it wrong just respond with this

[Fryguy64]

Face Five! All right!!

[Smashchu]

*facefive*?

[Flip]

8bitretroshit said:

When somebody uses it wrong just respond with this

Ugh... That movie is waaaay overrated

[Johans Nidorino]

I'm still wondering what was that fairy thing Zelda was doing in the Nintendo Conference Fall 2007 movie.

[Smashchu]

nidorino said:

I'm still wondering what was that fairy thing Zelda was doing in the Nintendo Conference Fall 2007 movie.

Taunt probably. And I think Link was actually doing it.

[Spud]

smashchu2 said:

admin said:

I think the word "vigorously" pretty much applies itself automatically to dirty thoughts. Just like the word "girth".

That's what I was thinking off. But we really need to use Todd less. It's not as special if you just spam it when someone says something close to what could be considered an innuendo. I say use him when there is a good opportunity, or it's clever.

The only reason we started using todd more was becasue there was a drought of total-all-encompassing-toddlessness.

[Smashchu]

spud said:

smashchu2 said:

That's what I was thinking off. But we really need to use Todd less. It's not as special if you just spam it when someone says something close to what could be considered an innuendo. I say use him when there is a good opportunity, or it's clever.

The only reason we started using todd more was becasue there was a drought of total-all-encompassing-toddlessness.

New word?

It's just, kind of lame to use it whenever. When done at appropriate times, many lulz will ensure. Don't do it for me. Do it for the lulz.

[TV Eye]

smashchu2 said:

When done at appropriate times, many lulz will ensure.

[Spud]

tveye said:

smashchu2 said:

When done at appropriate times, many lulz will ensure.

You've lost me.

Lulz doesn't work as well as lawls since lawl (l ah l) is pronounced as you'd spell lol lulz sounds to much like lullaby thus making tranquil.