|
|
Post by Fryguy64 on Dec 10, 2007 5:25:34 GMT -5
This is my argument with Krystal. All evidence points to inclusion, but that does not mean as a playable character.
Edit: Why does Sakurai talk like Borat?
|
|
|
|
Post by Flip on Dec 10, 2007 8:12:44 GMT -5
This is my argument with Krystal. All evidence points to inclusion, but that does not mean as a playable character. Edit: Why does Sakurai talk like Borat? XD Never thought if that way... |
|
|
|
Post by kirbychu on Dec 10, 2007 13:59:04 GMT -5
Why does Sakurai talk like Borat? I actually work with a Japanese woman, and that's exactly how she talks. Which makes me think either the story is true, or whoever wrote it knows some Japanese people.  |
|
|
|
Post by Arcadenik on Dec 10, 2007 19:09:11 GMT -5
Lolo or Lolo & Lala (team) in Brawl would be cool. I would like Lolo and Lala together as a team (a la Ice Climbers) since Diddy Kong is solo and is not teaming up with Dixie Kong in Brawl and that Lolo and Lala working as a team is what they are known for in the Kirby series (as opposed to the Eggerland series). So Lolo & Lala would be a cool 4th Kirby character in Brawl.
|
|
|
|
Post by Manspeed on Dec 10, 2007 21:51:54 GMT -5
But that would be kind of unfair to the rest of the franchises. Kirby already has three characters while DK has only two and F-Zero and MOTHER are still stuck with one each. I'd rather Lolo get in by himself and represent his own game. Then he can have stuff from his game as a moveset.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dances in Undergarments on Dec 11, 2007 2:20:38 GMT -5
You can't be 'unfair' to a fucking video game franchise. If Sakurai wanted 8 Kirby characters, 15 Mario characters, and 0 Zelda ones, he could do it. You can't be 'unfair'.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sqrt2 on Dec 11, 2007 3:40:35 GMT -5
F-Zero and MOTHER are still stuck with one each. I haven't seen Falcon unveiled as a playable character yet. Have I missed something? |
|
|
|
Post by Fryguy64 on Dec 11, 2007 7:09:27 GMT -5
You can't be 'unfair' to a wizzleing video game franchise. If Sakurai wanted 8 Kirby characters, 15 Mario characters, and 0 Zelda ones, he could do it. You can't be 'unfair'. You speak sense, and I like the taste of it! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by TV Eye on Dec 11, 2007 7:32:51 GMT -5
F-Zero and MOTHER are still stuck with one each. I haven't seen Falcon unveiled as a playable character yet. Have I missed something? Yes, but isn't it obvious? |
|
|
|
Post by Johans Nidorino on Dec 11, 2007 10:47:26 GMT -5
F-Zero and MOTHER are still stuck with one each. I haven't seen Falcon unveiled as a playable character yet. Have I missed something? Not yet. I agree with Roberto on him better being Lolo and not Lololo. And Arcadenik... Diddy Kong + Dixie Kong wasn't going to happen anyway, or even going to lower the chances of Lolo and Lala. They are too heterogenous (it's one of the things I insist shouldn't have been taken seriously from the polls). |
|
|
|
Post by Manspeed on Dec 11, 2007 18:37:21 GMT -5
You can't be 'unfair' to a wizzleing video game franchise. If Sakurai wanted 8 Kirby characters, 15 Mario characters, and 0 Zelda ones, he could do it. You can't be 'unfair'. But you CAN be unfair to the FANS of those franchises. Imagine all those poor F-Zero fans who don't get to see anything more than a lousy Assist Trophy, which also happens to be the character that most would've rather had as the next playable F-Zero character. |
|
|
|
Post by Flip on Dec 11, 2007 18:48:28 GMT -5
Outside the argument on whether Lolo can appear or not, if he were it would be as his own character. I can't see them ignoring years of Eggerland games just for ease of inclusion.
|
|
thores
Bubbles
Kirby and Pikachu: BFF
Posts: 581
|
Post by thores on Dec 11, 2007 20:53:03 GMT -5
You can't be 'unfair' to a wizzleing video game franchise. If Sakurai wanted 8 Kirby characters, 15 Mario characters, and 0 Zelda ones, he could do it. You can't be 'unfair'. Yeah, but I would still cry like a 12 year old girl.  |
|
