|
|
Post by Johans Nidorino on Jul 12, 2010 22:47:51 GMT -5
You'd make a good attorney, Shrikeswind  The irony kirbychu found was still funny. |
|
|
|
Post by Da Robot on Jul 12, 2010 23:25:41 GMT -5
I had a school project where I talked about the anglerfish and how it's adaptions benefitted it's survival a few years ago, so I already knew most of the species info. Though he should have posted this real image of an anglerfish. (Which ironically is the header image for TV Tropes "High Octane Nightmare Fuel: Animals" and even comments on Pixar Anglerfish). |
|
|
|
Post by kirbychu on Jul 13, 2010 3:39:50 GMT -5
He was gunnin' for the idea of a star-role angler-fish, basically, if Pixar had made an angler-fish to be something other than a monster or villain. Still, as I remember it all the fish in Finding Nemo were pretty realistic, excluding (obviously) their facial features. |
|
|
|
Post by Shrikeswind on Jul 13, 2010 3:53:11 GMT -5
You ever hear that expression that the eyes are the windows into the soul? Well guess what.
|
|
|
|
Post by kirbychu on Jul 13, 2010 3:57:31 GMT -5
Hence the (obviously). |
|
|
|
Post by Shrikeswind on Jul 13, 2010 21:34:16 GMT -5
And so, we're on the same page so far. Understand I find his comment rather silly, but take note that all Pixar needed to do was give that angler cartoony eyes and they could have rolled her into an actual character as opposed to the monster from the dark abyss. That's all I'm saying.
|
|
|
|
Post by kirbychu on Jul 14, 2010 4:40:12 GMT -5
The Pixar angler does have cartoony eyes already. In fact, it has the biggest set of eyes in the entire movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shrikeswind on Jul 14, 2010 14:17:20 GMT -5
Okay, now you're just arguing to be a jerk-ass.
|
|
|
|
Post by kirbychu on Jul 14, 2010 14:18:50 GMT -5
Hello pot, this is kettle. You're black. |
|
|
|
Post by Shrikeswind on Jul 14, 2010 21:53:00 GMT -5
Hello, Kettle. Thank you for the update. For the longest time I was afraid I'd gone colorblind. I thought I was blue. If black I am, then I suppose it'd have to do with that jerk-off who keeps dropping me in the fire every time he takes me camping. I swear, fire-stains take forever to get out. How's Cup? Pan is fine, though she's having trouble getting some egg out of her. She's afraid she may have to see Steel Wool, and as we all know, Steel Wool is incredibly abrasive and no one really likes him. I hope all is well, Kettle. Sincerely, Pot.
Yes, I went there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fryguy64 on Jul 15, 2010 3:51:22 GMT -5
Can't... move... for the irony! I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the point was missed...
Shrike, I hope you realise that "Pot calling the kettle black" basically means "You are king of arguing just to be a jerk-ass"... which you just proved with your drawn-out bollocks.
Now stop arguing about angler fish and kettles. Read that sentence again and tell me it's not retarded that's what you're doing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shrikeswind on Jul 15, 2010 20:01:55 GMT -5
No, I got the point, otherwise I'd have continued with the angler-fish argument. Instead, what happened was I got the point and, as I began filling out a normal reply (which would have been pretty much "Yeah, okay, I'm being a jerk-ass, I'll shut up now,") that little lightbulb went off, and in that fraction of an instant I realized, "If I don't do it, the world will fall into chaos." You know, one of those thoughts. And so I deleted the old reply and went with it, creating a non-sequitor intended ENTIRELY to cut off further argument over the angler-fish since, well, I got Kirbychu's point and felt that if I continued, the argument would only become too ridiculous for any reasonably minded human being to continue. At least this way, we have something so stupid it simply forces you to halt all argument. Kirbychu wins the argument, I get the last word, everybody wins.
|
|
|
|
Post by Koopaul on Jul 15, 2010 22:49:22 GMT -5
Eh honestly it really depends on you're point of view. I don't think either of you are wrong.
And Fryguy try not to pick sides, I think they are both equally being foolish.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fryguy64 on Jul 16, 2010 3:24:16 GMT -5
Koopaul, I picked a side because calling someone out for being a jerk-ass when you are being just as bad is not OK round 'ere! The entire argument is a bit mental and pointless, agreed. However, Shrikeswind, don't feel the need to name-call and ramble incessently just to try and make a point. It makes you look ridiculous. There were no good thoughts happening here, and no, I don't get thoughts that level of crazy. I do, however, get a little power-crazy lightbulb that occasionally goes off and tells me "I can lock any thread, temporarily block any member from posting, screw around with peoples' user profiles..." That lightbulb tends to get triggered by people who name-call and ramble incessently to try to make a point......  |
|
|
|
Post by kirbychu on Jul 16, 2010 5:24:48 GMT -5
Personally, I still think I had a point. THAT'S RIGHT, I APOLOGISE FOR NOTHING. |
|
