|
Post by Boo Destroyer on Jul 22, 2011 17:54:08 GMT -5
He does go after a bunch of other villains in the RPG titles, doesn't he?
Oh wait, you mean the main platformers...
|
|
|
Post by asiacatdogblue on Jul 22, 2011 18:20:39 GMT -5
I never played Farmvillie. Farmville's a game with no story or depth. It's a game people's moms play on Facebook. Even calling it a game is an insult to creations like Wind Waker and Street Fighter and the rest of games most of us can identify with. I see someone takes video gaming seriously.
|
|
|
Post by Manspeed on Jul 22, 2011 21:20:43 GMT -5
What did you expect to find on a forum that's part of a website dedicated to chronicling Nintendo's history?
|
|
|
Post by nocturnal YL on Jul 23, 2011 0:01:33 GMT -5
You enjoy gaming for all its worth and experience everything within a game, right? Back then, there wasn't much, So games like Pac-Man and Donkey Kong were considered masterpieces back then, but are now just time-wasters, I guess. Sounds to me that you're looking for gaming experience that are challenging, yet relatively contentless. Those arcade-like stuff are still being made now (in form of "casual" games - some are at the difficulty of those old days too), so stop ranting how gaming today is inferior. But yeah, videogame is just a very broad term that includes a lot of different forms of interactive entertanment. It doesn't have to be what you think it is; and you're... not really talking about gaming in general here, given how specific your examples here. ...do I even know what I'm saying, anymore? I'm not sure of that, but I don't know what you're saying anymore, that's for sure.
|
|
|
Post by asiacatdogblue on Jul 24, 2011 15:48:58 GMT -5
I have never said "today's games are inferior." I just explained what video games were like back then.
|
|
|
Post by Manspeed on Jul 24, 2011 16:35:38 GMT -5
....Then you went on to say that Mario, a game known for having next to no story, should have even less story, an argument which I'm still trying to wrap my head around.
|
|