|
|
Post by Snuka7 on Jan 6, 2008 18:21:16 GMT -5
Since Brawl is coming out so close to now who do you want in the roster at the last minute. Here is mine, I can't be bothered typing so I made a pic with most of the characters I want in Brawl.  Along with these guys, I also want King K Rool, Lucario and Wolf. But couldn't find Sprites. |
|
|
|
Post by kirbychu on Jan 6, 2008 18:32:19 GMT -5
Actually, I don't want any characters in the rooster. That's animal cruelty.
Incidentally, what's your favourite kind of rooster? Mine is the Rhode Island Red.
I just couldn't resist.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spud on Jan 6, 2008 19:18:35 GMT -5
Rooster 4 Brawl!!!!!!11!!111!11!1!twelve
|
|
|
|
Post by Snuka7 on Jan 6, 2008 19:57:37 GMT -5
Actually, I don't want any characters in the rooster. That's animal cruelty. Incidentally, what's your favourite kind of rooster? Mine is the Rhode Island Red. I just couldn't resist. Stuffed up. Man you guys don't let a little thing go. But huh I fixed it.  |
|
|
|
Post by TV Eye on Jan 6, 2008 23:14:23 GMT -5
Heheehe, I doubt anyone will be added in the last minute though. I believe all characters shown are starters, and everyone else are unlockables.
Also, I think every character that has been previously unlocked in a Smash Brothers game, will also be an unlockable here. Including Ness.
|
|
|
|
Post by Snuka7 on Jan 7, 2008 2:39:06 GMT -5
Heheehe, I doubt anyone will be added in the last minute though. I believe all characters shown are starters, and everyone else are unlockables. Also, I think every character that has been previously unlocked in a Smash Brothers game, will also be an unlockable here. Including Ness. I don't meen last minute additions, I meen...just your rooster, I mean roster. |
|
|
|
Post by Smashchu on Jan 7, 2008 7:45:10 GMT -5
Don't know about you guys, but I'm holding out for Falcon.
I have a theory that there are even starters Sakurai hasn't shown yet and he'll never show them till the game comes out.
|
|
|
|
Post by NinjaRygar on Jan 9, 2008 15:32:09 GMT -5
I know at this point it's beating a dead horse....
But my ONLY WISH is for Krystal to NOT be in it. To be NOT playable.
That is my one and only hope.
I know it's... possible.... she might be playable. I've prepared myself for that. I just hate Krystal with every fiber of my being. She's right up there with Shadow the hedgehog, Sora and Bridget on my list of worst characters ever. And she's top tier.
I'll be happy with anything else. The game will be the greatest ever no matter what happens at this point.... but MY dream roster is one that is "Krystal-clear".
|
|
|
|
Post by Smashchu on Jan 9, 2008 16:00:42 GMT -5
Actually, I would like to see Krystal in Brawl. You can't get hung up on the furry crap. Furries suck in general. That doesn't mean they everything they instantly touch is going to suck, otherwise we wouldn't have much to talk about. Furries suck, and they will ruin anything in Brawl (not just Krystal) in general. I'd like to see her as I think she'd be a fun character, and it'd be nice to get another female, and she could make a fun character.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spud on Jan 9, 2008 16:26:59 GMT -5
Actually, I would like to see Krystal in Brawl. You can't get hung up on the furry crap. Furries suck in general. That doesn't mean they everything they instantly touch is going to suck, otherwise we wouldn't have much to talk about. Furries suck, and they will ruin anything in Brawl (not just Krystal) in general. I'd like to see her as I think she'd be a fun character, and it'd be nice to get another female, and she could make a fun character. Krystal's a bad character to begin with. She doesn't really serve a real purpose in the starfox series. We already know she's in, but I don't think she's really good material for a PC. I'd enjoy seing her as an AT or background support character in SSE, or even simply as a gimmick for a starfox level. But Rosterwise I think even Slippy would be better. |
|
|
|
Post by TV Eye on Jan 9, 2008 16:38:02 GMT -5
I know at this point it's beating a dead horse.... But my ONLY WISH is for Krystal to NOT be in it. To be NOT playable. That is my one and only hope. I know it's... possible.... she might be playable. I've prepared myself for that. I just hate Krystal with every fiber of my being. She's right up there with Shadow the hedgehog, Sora and Bridget on my list of worst characters ever. And she's top tier. I'll be happy with anything else. The game will be the greatest ever no matter what happens at this point.... but MY dream roster is one that is "Krystal-clear". Um...yeah, haven't we already been through this a hundred times? Nothings wrong with Krystal, just the people who fap to her. Nothings wrong with Shadow, just the people who fap to him. Nothings wrong with any of those characters, except the people who fap to them. Do we really need another anti-Krystal argument? For God's sake, no. |
|
|
|
Post by Smashchu on Jan 9, 2008 17:35:20 GMT -5
Actually, I would like to see Krystal in Brawl. You can't get hung up on the furry crap. Furries suck in general. That doesn't mean they everything they instantly touch is going to suck, otherwise we wouldn't have much to talk about. Furries suck, and they will ruin anything in Brawl (not just Krystal) in general. I'd like to see her as I think she'd be a fun character, and it'd be nice to get another female, and she could make a fun character. Krystal's a bad character to begin with. She doesn't really serve a real purpose in the starfox series. We already know she's in, but I don't think she's really good material for a PC. I'd enjoy seing her as an AT or background support character in SSE, or even simply as a gimmick for a starfox level. But Rosterwise I think even Slippy would be better. But you could make that argument for any characters. If it's not the main character, it's not needed. Some people like the character, and others don't. But don't try to say that the character, factually, sucks because you don't care for them. Sorry, that may have been much. I just don't think it's fair top run around saying the character is bad when that may not be the case. If you had a PHD in Literature then maybe you could say X character sucks (and what's wrong). And I pretty much agree with TV Eye |
|
|
|
Post by Spud on Jan 9, 2008 18:58:16 GMT -5
Krystal's a bad character to begin with. She doesn't really serve a real purpose in the starfox series. We already know she's in, but I don't think she's really good material for a PC. I'd enjoy seing her as an AT or background support character in SSE, or even simply as a gimmick for a starfox level. But Rosterwise I think even Slippy would be better. But you could make that argument for any characters. If it's not the main character, it's not needed. Some people like the character, and others don't. But don't try to say that the character, factually, sucks because you don't care for them. Sorry, that may have been much. I just don't think it's fair top run around saying the character is bad when that may not be the case. If you had a PHD in Literature then maybe you could say X character sucks (and what's wrong). And I pretty much agree with TV Eye I'm not saying she's bad because she's not the main character or that I don't care for her, I'm just saying she's not well established in the Starfox series yet. Krystal's sole position seems to add tension to Fox's situations and play on a possible relationship between the two. She is just not a good stand alone character nor a mascot of a series. And Fact is she is a bad character. After a while she may be a good character. I do not run around saying she's bad because maybe I don't like her. I love Waluigi, but is he a good character? No. and for the same reason Krystal is. They're just not important to their series. |
|
|
|
Post by Smashchu on Jan 9, 2008 19:27:01 GMT -5
But you could make that argument for any characters. If it's not the main character, it's not needed. Some people like the character, and others don't. But don't try to say that the character, factually, sucks because you don't care for them. Sorry, that may have been much. I just don't think it's fair top run around saying the character is bad when that may not be the case. If you had a PHD in Literature then maybe you could say X character sucks (and what's wrong). And I pretty much agree with TV Eye I'm not saying she's bad because she's not the main character or that I don't care for her, I'm just saying she's not well established in the Starfox series yet. Krystal's sole position seems to add tension to Fox's situations and play on a possible relationship between the two. She is just not a good stand alone character nor a mascot of a series. Yeah, I could agree with that. But I don't think it's fair to say that. Her role is nothing new, but is a role nonetheless. I mean, she did make SFC (for better or for worse). She pretty much is the main female role. Unoriginal, but it's no different then Peach or Zelda. You really can't claim it becuase the argument can go either way. I could say Mario is a poor character too. Thus, the degree in Literature. Sorry, I'm just kind of sick of the character hate, Krystal in particular. People will right out say that we need more females but will shove their noses at the character. Truth is, someone likes them. |
|
|
|
Post by TV Eye on Jan 9, 2008 20:01:30 GMT -5
Let's just end the Krystal discussion here, okay? Krystal arguments get pretty...viscous...and I just think we should avoid them.
|
|
